|
|
Scholarly?
Both general/popular and
professional/scholarly resources can provide reliable
information, but
professional/scholarly resources are more authoritative.
|
Literature Appropriate for College-Level Research
Not all literature is appropriate for
college-level research (and literature that is okay in
Freshman-level courses may not be acceptable for upper-level work.)
Books and anthologies (collections of articles or essays),
periodical articles, papers presented at conferences, theses and
dissertations, reference resources, and pages or documents on
the Web all need to be evaluated not only for content but also
for credibility.
In
general, the more reputable the author, the publication, and/or
the publisher, the greater your assurance that the information
is appropriate for college-level research.
Imagine a spectrum with
“sensational” publications (tabloid newspapers like the
National
Enquirer, questionable magazines like
Hustler,
and “bodice-ripper” romances) on one end; popular general
literature (Time &
Newsweek; Gone with the Wind)
in the middle; and trade, professional, and scholarly or learned publications (The Wall Street
Journal; JAMA, the Journal of the
American Medical Association; Milton’s Paradise Lost)
on the other end.
(Look below to see a graphic using periodical titles to
illustrate this idea.)
Many
professors require literature from, or nearest to, the scholarly end of
this spectrum.
|
|
 |
General vs. Scholarly
Resources
A
layperson who is not interested in in-depth information
may desire non-technical, perhaps even superficial,
information; but the professional
or scholar may require very carefully researched and
well-documented professional or scholarly information.
For example, a
non-specialist doing some leisure reading on “health and
fitness” may find appropriate information in items in
the second column of the table below, while the
professional or scholar may need the authoritative
materials in the third column.
|
| |
Layperson's
General-Interest Resources |
Specialist's
Scholarly/Professional Resources |
| Periodicals
|
Men’s Health
or Shape Magazine |
ACSM's Health
and Fitness Journal |
|
Reference books |
The Harvard
Medical School Family Health Guide |
Spinal Cord
Injury Desk Reference: Guidelines for Life Care
Planning and Case Management |
| Trade
books |
The New York
Times Book of Health: How to Feel Fitter, Eat
Better, and Live Longer |
Cardiac
Rehabilitation, Adult Fitness, and Exercise
Testing |
|
Videos
|
Eight
Weeks to Optimum Health |
Minimizing
Legal Liability: Risk Management for
Health/Fitness Programs and Facilities
|
| Websites |
BBC Health
(http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/healthy_living/fitness/) |
American College
of Sports Medicine
(http://www.acsm.org/) |
|
Primary and Secondary Sources

Professional/scholarly literature can
be either primary or secondary. The definition of
primary and secondary information varies somewhat
from one discipline to another, but most scholars
agree that if the author is directly reporting on
his/her research observations, actions, experiences,
experiments, clinical trials, surveys, or other
data, the
document is primary literature. Diaries,
journals, laboratory notes, letters,
first-hand reports of research, legal decisions, articles presenting
new original ideas, and the like,
therefore, are primary sources.
Commentary, examination,
analysis, explanation,
translation, interpretation,
criticism, history, promotion,
refutation, and other types of
writing that focus on earlier source documents or
on events in which the author was not a direct
participant are generally considered secondary
literature.
A primary source is not necessarily a
scholarly source. For instance, the diary of a 13-year-old
girl is unlikely to be written in a scholarly
fashion; however, such a diary may be used by scholars and
quoted in scholarly research, as The Diary of
Anne Frank has been, to better elucidate and
understand a particular era or event.
|
Professional/Scholarly Literature
Professional/scholarly information is more highly valued
in academe because these resources are more likely to
present an in-depth, comprehensive, and authoritative
argument or investigation of a clearly-defined problem
or topic.
Scholarly works (articles, papers,
books)
are judged by their contribution to the research and by
the validity of the information they provide -- the
thoroughness, attention to detail, and adherence to
their research method. Academic disciplines and
professional researchers generally follow a research
method that is appropriate to their field. For
instance, researchers in the sciences adhere to the
"scientific method" (question; review the
literature to gather background information;
hypothesize; experiment and observe; analyze, reflect,
speculate; draw conclusions or theorize; report results;
replicate.) Research in the sciences is usually
reported in articles written in a format, IMRD,
that mirrors the research method:
- I: articles begin
with an introduction that describes the
question, presents a review of the literature, and
defines the working hypothesis.
- M: the next section of the
article describes method, methodology, and/or
materials of the experiment and the
process of observation or data-gathering techniques.
- R: the results
report the data gathered.
- D: a discussion
offers an analysis of the data.
- Some articles include a final
section, the conclusion, that offers a more
definitive statement of the implications,
inferences, or deductions that can be made based on
the information gathered.
When a substantial number of works
have been brought forward, a review that
examines the data of the lot, may synthesize and
summarize the findings. From this review a theory, policy,
or procedure may be suggested. Evidence-based practice
(or research-based practice) recommendations are made based on an
examination and application of the data collected in
these types of reviews. |
Scholarly works
-
almost always are
written by a scholar, researcher, specialist, or
practicing professional in the field encompassing
the problem or topic.
-
generally include
extensive background information.
-
usually reference
previous work and have extensive bibliographies.
-
if books or other
published reports, are often but not always,
reviewed in scholarly journals.
Professional/scholarly publications are brought forward
via
-
Professional and
scholarly societies such as the American Chemical
Society, IEEE (Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers), and NCTE (National Council
of Teachers of English).
-
University presses
like Johns Hopkins, Ohio University’s Swallow Press,
and Oxford University Press.
-
Commercial
publishers/imprints such as Elsevier Science, Basic
Books,
and
Nature which specialize in
professional and scholarly resources.
|

Peer Reviewed, Refereed, Juried?
The publication or presentation process for professional and scholarly information
assures that the content is more likely to be
authoritative, credible, accurate, and objective because
books, articles, and presentation proposals are carefully scrutinized by
editors, program committees, and/or
other knowledgeable individuals prior to publication or presentation.
Journals (professional and scholarly periodicals) that
require that articles be examined by other experts or
scholars prior to publication are designated as “peer
reviewed,” “refereed,” “juried,” or “blind reviewed.”
Our library webpage,
Types of
Periodical Literature and Peer Reviewed Articles,
shows how to use Ulrich's
Periodicals Directory to determine if a
periodical is a scholarly journal and if it is peer
reviewed. You may also download our Word document,
"My
Resource is Professional or Scholarly If..."
For more information about scholarly articles, see the
Research Tutorial on
Articles.
|
On the Web?
Professional/scholarly information is being published on
the Web, but much of that information is protected
within members-only websites. Utilizing a specialized search engine such as
Google Scholar,
PubMed, or National Science Digital Library
may expedite the search process, but be aware that
generally speaking these search engines do not index all
of the resources covered by the library's subject-specific
research databases and that you may have to pay for
online documents that the library's catalogs and
research databases provide for free.
The easiest
way to locate FREE professional/scholarly books and articles on
the Web is to use the library's subject-specific research databases
and library catalogs.
|
|
To go to the next page in the Research
Strategies tutorial, click
Reference. |
Get help via
IM,
Chat With a Librarian,
email
(Reference_Services@Shawnee.edu),
or by phoning (740.351.3321).
If you prefer face-to-face
assistance, stop by the Clark Memorial Library Reference Counter or
schedule a Research
Consultation with a Reference Librarian.
|