![]() |
|
Scholarly? Both general/popular and professional/scholarly resources can provide reliable information, but professional/scholarly resources are more authoritative. |
||||||||||||||||||
|
Literature Appropriate for College-Level Research Not all literature is appropriate for college-level research (and literature that is okay in Freshman-level courses may not be acceptable for upper-level work.) Books and anthologies (collections of articles or essays), periodical articles, papers presented at conferences, theses and dissertations, reference resources, and pages or documents on the Web all need to be evaluated not only for content but also for credibility. In general, the more reputable the author, the publication, and/or the publisher, the greater your assurance that the information is appropriate for college-level research. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Imagine a spectrum with
“sensational” publications (tabloid newspapers like the
National
Enquirer, questionable magazines like
Hustler,
and “bodice-ripper” romances) on one end; popular general
literature (Time &
Newsweek; Gone with the Wind)
in the middle; and trade, professional, and scholarly or learned publications (The Wall Street
Journal; JAMA, the Journal of the
American Medical Association; Milton’s Paradise Lost)
on the other end.
(Look at the graphic below to see an illustration of this
idea using periodical titles.)
Many professors require literature from, or nearest to, the scholarly end of this spectrum. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
General vs. Scholarly
Resources |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Primary and Secondary Sources
Professional/scholarly literature can
be either primary or secondary. The definition of
primary and secondary information varies somewhat
from one discipline to another, but most scholars
agree that if the author is directly reporting on
his/her research observations, actions, experiences,
experiments, clinical trials, surveys, etc., the
document is primary literature. Diaries,
journals, laboratory notes, letters,
first-hand reports of research, articles presenting
new original ideas, and the like,
therefore, are primary sources. Commentary, examination, analysis, explanation, translation, interpretation, criticism, history, promotion, refutation, and other types of writing that focus on earlier source documents or events in which the author was not a direct participant are generally secondary literature. A primary source is not necessarily a scholarly source. The diary of a 13-year-old girl is unlikely to be written in a scholarly fashion; however, that diary may be used by scholars and quoted in scholarly research, as The Diary of Anne Frank has been, to better elucidate and understand a particular era or event. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Professional/Scholarly Literature Professional/scholarly information is more highly valued in academe because these resources are more likely to present an in-depth, comprehensive, and authoritative argument or investigation of a clearly-defined problem or topic. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Scholarly works are judged not only by their contribution to research and the validity of the information they provide, but also by their adherence to the research method, their thoroughness, and their attention to detail and to technical data. Scholarly works
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
The presentation or publication
process for professional and scholarly information
assures that the content is more likely to be
authoritative, credible, accurate, and objective because
presentation topics, books, or articles are carefully scrutinized by
program committees, editors, and/or
other scholars prior to presentation or publication.
Journals that require that articles be examined by other experts or scholars prior to publication are designated as “peer reviewed,” “refereed,” “juried,” or “blind reviewed.” |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Professional/scholarly publications are brought forward via
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
On the Web? Professional/scholarly information is being published on the Web, but much of that information is protected within members-only websites. When searching for professional/scholarly resources in a general Google or Yahoo! search, examine the document for the same characteristics that distinguish hard copy resources: authority, specificity, background information, references and bibliographies, etc. Utilizing a specialized search engine such as Google Scholar, Windows Live Academic Search, PubMed, or National Science Digital Library may expedite the search process, but be aware that generally speaking these search engines do not index all of the resources covered by the subject-specific research databases and that you may have to pay for online documents that the library's catalogs and research databases provide for free. |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
The easiest way to locate professional/scholarly books and articles on the Web is to use the library's subject-specific research databases and library catalogs. |
|||||||||||||||||||
| To go to the next page in the Research Strategies tutorial, click Reference. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Need Help? Get help via IM, email (Reference_Services@Shawnee.edu), or by phoning (740.351.3321). If you prefer face-to-face assistance, stop by the Clark Memorial Library Reference Counter or schedule a Research Consultation with a Reference Librarian. |
|||||||||||||||||||
This page maintained by Janet Stewart |
|
Shawnee
State University |
Last Updated: |
For
technical issues, please contact the
webmaster at
Webmaster@Shawnee.edu |